◉ Live Signal

The case they
cannot ignore

The most EXPLOSIVE political expose in history. High Stakes Treason presents Ian Trottier’s open-source case concerning former CIA Director John Brennan.

Price includes shipping and handling.

High Stakes Treason book coverIan Trottier recording at a microphone
● Live SignalIndependent media
and new appearances
◉ Live SignalNew content
updated regularly
InterviewsPodcastsDocumentsSpanishTruth has no language. →
Roger Stone holding High Stakes Treason
“One of the most important and shocking books I have read in my 50 years in politics.”Roger Stone
Political Strategist & Author

The Story

They tried
to bury it.

Follow the book, the source material, and the ongoing conversation.

2001

The Origin

A devastating event that began a global war on terror. A door of treason in America is opened.

2009–2017

The Pattern

A trail of decisions. A web of consequences. A nation set on a course.

2025

The Reckoning

The open-source case. The evidence. The time for answers.

The Book

Read the case for yourself.

Released July 22, 2025, High Stakes Treason is a 430-page examination of allegations concerning intelligence, financial conflicts, and public accountability.

Seek and Destroy Communism graphic

Reader Reviews

Read the book? Leave a review on Amazon.

Reviews are the number one way to help other readers discover High Stakes Treason. It takes 60 seconds and makes a huge difference.

★ Write a Review on Amazon

Frequently Asked Questions

Questioning the narrative.

High Stakes Treason graphic featuring John Brennan
What do DNI Gabbard's July 18, 2025 declassified documents reveal?

Recently released primary documents from the intelligence community, internal emails, the September 2016 pre-election assessment, and a withdrawn Presidential Daily Brief, show the assessment was first ordered as a National Intelligence Estimate and then downgraded to a less rigorous Intelligence Community Assessment “in the interest of time.” The documents state there was “no indication” Russia was manipulating the vote count, record that the FBI and NSA held only low confidence in the attribution of the data leaks, and show the September 2016 judgment was that Russia sought to discredit the process rather than elect any candidate. Read the documents and the ten findings →

Why a qui tam must be filed against John Brennan
The case for it rests on the federally funded machinery documented in High Stakes Treason: a private intelligence contractor holding counterterrorism contracts while its owner ran the agency awarding them; false official statements used to obtain and sustain federal funding; and knowingly false records submitted through programs the government paid for. Under the False Claims Act, that is the shape of a false claim, and the statute reaches those who cause one as well as those who sign it, with treble damages and a relator’s share of the recovery. Two requirements decide whether such an action can succeed, and both are set out in full on the companion page: the claim for payment must be specific and provable, and the public disclosure bar must be overcome, which it can be by a relator who reported to the government before publication, or whose knowledge materially adds to the public record. What a qui tam is, what it requires, and the four gates →
Does the government's own declassified report confirm what High Stakes Treason documents?

Yes. The DNI-released HPSCI report “Oversight Investigation & Referral” (declassified 22 July 2025) finds that the ICA’s central judgment failed the intelligence community’s own analytic standards, that the Director of CIA ordered previously withheld, substandard reporting published so it could be cited, that the phrase “strongly preferred Republicans” does not appear in the raw intelligence at all, and that NSA dissented. Read the ten findings side by side with the book, every quote sourced to the report itself: The Declassified Record →

How much did Congress appropriate for the War on Terror around the three attacks in the book?

High Stakes Treason works from three terrorism events, each given its own chapter: the Christmas Day 2009 "underwear bomber" (Abdulmutallab, Northwest Flight 253), the Norway government attack (Breivik, 22 July 2011), and the Boston Marathon bombing (April 2013).

Here is what Congress actually appropriated for the Global War on Terror in each of those fiscal years, official CRS figures, all agencies, nominal dollars:

EventFYGWOT appropriated that yearCumulative to that point
Christmas Day bomber2010$171.0 bn$1,120.8 bn
Norway attack2011$166.5 bn≈$1.28 tn
Boston Marathon2013$94.5 bn≈$1.51 tn

The total fell 45% across the three events, from $171.0 bn to $94.5 bn. Congress passed no supplemental in response to Norway or Boston. Boston's year was the lowest war appropriation since 2003–04.

That is precisely the point. Brennan did not need total war spending to rise. He needed the counterterrorism slice to rise while the wars wound down, and it did:

  • Aviation security: after the Christmas Day plot, DHS sought a $1.1 bn increase, with TSA's budget request rising from $5,267m to $5,729m for body scanners and screening.
  • Afghanistan/OEF: $59.5 bn (2009) → $104.9 bn (2010) → $119.4 bn (2011).
  • After Boston: the FY2015 budget requested a new $5.0 bn Counterterrorism Partnerships Fund.

A shrinking war budget with a growing counterterrorism budget is the ideal environment for an NCTC-centred contractor, which is exactly where Brennan held his shares.

Sources: Congressional Research Service RL33110 (2010, 2011, 2014 editions), R41232, R41189, R44519; Public Law 111-212; Department of Defense Cost of War reports; Brown University Costs of War; U.S. Department of Justice. The 2013 cumulative figure is derived from CRS totals and is approximate.

Did John Brennan approve 9/11?

According to former State Department employee Michael Springmann, 15 of the 19 visas issued to the 9/11 hijackers came out of the U.S. visa jurisdiction in Saudi Arabia where John Brennan was serving. Watch the related Mike Benz video

According to former State Department employees Michael Springmann and Mike Benz, yes. There absolutely is.

Based on the evidence presented in High Stakes Treason, the CIA under Director George Tenet, with John Brennan serving as Tenet’s chief of staff from 1999 to 2001, did not merely fail to prevent 9/11, it actively enabled the attacks to succeed.

Brennan latched onto Tenet’s coattails in the mid-1990s. Tenet pulled him up, eventually making him the CIA’s executive director, its third-ranking officer. As chief of staff, Brennan would have been privy to exactly the same information as Director Tenet during the two most significant terrorist events of that era: the bombing of the USS Cole (October 2000) and the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The CIA knew two 9/11 hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, had entered the United States in January 2000, yet intentionally prevented FBI agents assigned to the CIA’s bin Laden station (Alec Station) from alerting the FBI. The CIA then used a false official statement (the Ali Soufan letterhead memorandum) to further block the FBI’s investigation.

CIA asset Anwar al-Awlaki had documented personal contact with six of the 9/11 hijackers, even purchasing airline tickets for several of them, including Mohamed Atta.

The book concludes: “the CIA withheld key information from the FBI to enable the 9/11 attacks to succeed.” The CIA had the means (asset reporting, SIGINT reporting, dissemination control), the motive (needing a new adversary to justify its multi-billion-dollar budget), and the opportunity to allow the attacks to happen, and John Brennan, as Tenet’s chief of staff, was positioned to know everything the Director knew.

For the full evidence and sourcing, see Chapters 2 and 6 of High Stakes Treason.

Is John Brennan a Communist?

Essentially, one can assess that yes, he indeed is.

Brennan confessed during a lie detector test that he was an operative for the Communist Party of America during four different election cycles. Due to institutional rot, this startling revelation somehow did not preclude Brennan from serving in the CIA.

Mr. Brennan likely rose through the ranks of the CIA due to his political sympathies and anti-US ideologies and, as a result, was chosen for its highest position by Mr. Obama.

The introduction in High Stakes Treason asks readers the following question: Who is John Brennan and how did an admitted communist become the head of the Central Intelligence Agency?

Who wrote High Stakes Treason?

High Stakes Treason was written by Ian Trottier, with a foreword by Roger Stone. Additional forewords have been provided by computer engineer Brooks Agnew, and former CIA agent John Kiriakou. Based on the multi-year investigation by former FBI agent John Donovan, the book is published by Bombardier Books, an imprint of Post Hill Press.

When was High Stakes Treason published?

The book was published on July 22, 2025. It is 430 pages. Notably, that same day, President Donald J. Trump claimed Barack Obama had committed treason.

Trump made the comments in the Oval Office that day during a meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.

Trump stated that Obama was “guilty” of treason and that “it’s time to go after people.”

The comments followed a release of declassified documents by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, which alleged a “treasonous conspiracy” by top Obama administration officials.

Watch video of Trump:

Watch Trottier’s interview that day on War Room with Steve Bannon:

Watch the War Room interview on Rumble
What is a Qui Tam lawsuit

A Qui Tam lawsuit is a civil action under the federal False Claims Act. It allows a private person, known as a relator, to bring an alleged fraud against the government to court on the government’s behalf. The United States Department of Justice may decide whether to take over the case. Read the Justice Department’s False Claims Act overview

In High Stakes Treason, Ian Trottier proposes a Qui Tam theory he calls “fraud by way of inducement.” He alleges that the conduct described in the book caused the United States to spend more on counterterrorism than it otherwise would have needed to spend.

That proposed civil theory is important to the book because it identifies a possible legal route for asking the government to examine the alleged financial harm. A Qui Tam action is not a criminal charge, proof that misconduct occurred, or legal advice. It is the author’s proposed theory based on the allegations presented in the book.

Anyone considering a False Claims Act action should seek advice from a qualified attorney.

When did John Brennan convert to Islam?

Former FBI Special Agent John Guandolo, a key leader of the bureau’s counterterrorism efforts after 9/11, revealed that Brennan converted to Islam while serving as CIA Station Chief in Saudi Arabia, estimated between 1996 and 1999. Guandolo stated that Brennan recited the shahada (the Islamic declaration of faith) in the presence of Saudi government and intelligence officials, and that U.S. government officials stationed in Saudi Arabia at the time were direct witnesses to his conversion.

Guandolo first made these claims public on February 8, 2013, during an appearance on Tom Trento’s radio program. The full three-hour broadcast is below:

How do I get an autographed copy?

Autographed copies are sold directly through this site. Order an autographed copy.

On the Air

Discussions that keep the needle moving.

All Appearances

Readers’ Reviews

What did you think?

Finished High Stakes Treason? Share your honest review with Ian.

Stay Connected

Stay ahead of the signal.

Be first to know about new interviews, appearances, and autographed-book announcements.

High Stakes Treason source material

The Record

Read. Watch.

Explore the book’s overview, source material, and interviews.